When Too Many Cooks Spoil The Decision
Involving others in the decision making process is generally a good idea.
People tend to be more satisfied with the outcome when the process used to arrive at that outcome is fair. And, who knows? You might come up with a better idea when others are involved.
But be careful…
Involving others in the decision making process takes time. Often managers have to make immediate decisions. If the production line stops, you might not have time to consult everyone on the floor as to the best course of action.
You could also look weak in times of crisis. If your building burns down, it may be much more effective to climb on top of the rubble with a megaphone and shout, “We will rebuild!” than, “Please be patient while we consult with each of you before we determine our best course of action.”
Finally, others may not be privy to the info needed to make an effective decision. Let’s face it, as manager you are privy to information that those a few rungs down are not. You are much less likely to generate effective solutions when you supply decision makers with partial information and half-truths.
And what happens when you make a decision that runs counter to what the group comes up with (because you understand the problem better than they do)? By ignoring their suggestions, you generate more dissatisfaction than you would have if you never asked for them for their input in the first place.
There are many reasons to involve others in the decision making process. But it’s not a prescription for success. Ineffective managers and leaders use the same decision making process regardless of the circumstances.
Is your career growing along with your manager’s?
Why you should never trust a silent boss
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!